@回家的你 春运出行这些安全隐患别忽视******
临近春节，人们外出增多，有的驾驶人为了图一时方便，将乘客和货物一起塞入车厢内，殊不知这种人货混装的行为，会给行车安全埋下很大安全隐患。
乘车不规范 人货混装生隐患
近日，陕西渭南高速交警在京昆高速韩城服务区例行检查时，发现一辆面包车后面两排座椅上的四名乘客都没有系安全带，旁边堆放着大包小包的行李。
原来，驾驶人郭某当天带着家人从河北保定前往四川达州探亲，由于拉载的行李过多，他便将后备厢放不下的行李堆放在座椅上，丝毫没有意识到这一行为的危险性。
高速交警 王奕超：人货混装是非常危险的行为，特别是在高速公路上行驶时，一旦车子发生紧急情况、刹车或转弯时，车内的货物很可能受惯力作用发生翻滚，极易砸伤车内人员，存在严重安全隐患。
前些天，高速交警在东昌高速江西抚州服务区发现一辆7座小车，里面部分座椅被拆卸，两名乘客就躺在车厢里。
驾车出行 请提前检查车况
春运期间，驾车长途出行需求增多，驾驶人出发前首先要对车辆安全情况做好检查，谨防车辆在行驶时发生突发情况。
近日，山西高速交警在视频巡逻时发现，一辆重型半挂牵引车在驶入高速后不久便停在了匝道口处，既没有开启报警闪光灯，也没有摆放警示标志，随后，驾驶人下车围着车子检查，周边不时有车辆驶过，交警立即电话联系了驾驶人，确认其车辆可以正常行驶后，要求其立即从前方收费站驶离高速。
交警在随后的检查中发现，这辆车子的水箱管路一直漏水，而驾驶人只是随意处理一下，并没有完全消除安全隐患，这就导致他在行车过程中时不时就要下车查看，而且现在正值寒冬，滴在路面的水很容易结冰给其他车辆造成安全隐患。
交警责令驾驶人立即消除安全隐患后再上路行驶，并对其车辆发生故障后未放置警示标志的行为处以罚款200元，驾驶证记3分。
还有修平高速江西九江境内的一起自燃事故，原因是这辆车的使用年限较长，加之驾驶人很少对车辆进行检查维护，导致在行驶过程中电路出现问题。
交警提醒，春运期间路面车流量较大，在高速公路发生故障或交通事故、自燃等情况需停车时，应第一时间持续开启危险报警闪光灯，并在故障车来车方向150米以外设置警示标志，车上人员应迅速转移到安全地带并报警。
规范装载 谨防意外
临近春节，物资运输需求旺盛，干线公路交通流量将持续增长，大客车、大货车、危化品运输车、小客车等各类车型混合通行程度升高，交通拥堵和事故风险凸显。交管部门提醒，车辆上路一定要规范装载，谨防发生意外。
近日，广西来宾交警在蒙村镇地六村路段巡逻时，发现一辆轻型自卸货车存在严重的超高、超长、超载的违法行为。经查，这辆货车核载重量为1.1吨，可过磅检查时，交警发现该这辆车重量竟达33.46吨。
在检查过程中交警还发现，驾驶人欧某并未将车上的货物绑紧系牢，只是简单地用几根木头相互卡住，在这种情况下，木头一旦在车辆行驶过程中掉落，极易砸到周围的车辆及行人，引发交通事故。交警依法对驾驶人欧某的违法超载行为处以罚款2000元，驾驶证记6分。
前些天在沪渝高速湖北宜昌段，一辆半挂车在行驶过程中，运载的玻璃突然脱落，随后砸向后方正常行驶的小车，小车驾驶人在向左避让的过程中，差点儿撞上中央护栏，事故导致小车前挡风玻璃及立柱受损，所幸没人受伤。通过排查，交警锁定肇事大货车并联系上了驾驶人陈某。
经询问，驾驶人陈某当天从江苏运送一车玻璃前往重庆，因为玻璃捆绑过紧，也没有用软性包裹进行保护，导致玻璃破碎掉落引发事故，交警认定，事故责任由驾驶人陈某承担。交警表示，无论装载任何货物，货运车辆出发前都应做好货物装载检查，行驶中发现有货物遗撒请及时将车停于应急车道或驶入就近服务区，然后报警求助。(央视新闻客户端)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 家彩网地图 |
